The Gamer Corner
No, I don't think anyone has attributed any quotes on this site
Talraen
Lost your password?
Cuzzdog (Tue 8:26 AM): Maybe they've gotten so lazy with the franchise the title was bugged and they just ran with it instead.
Balerion (Tue 9:05 AM): i09 Spoiler FAQ of Star Trek
Balerion (Tue 9:05 AM): I think that's mostly for Dowd, since it will reinforce his rage Smile
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:10 AM): 5 brilliant clues in the backgrounds of movies
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:10 AM): I haven't got to see Star Trek yet, but we're going to this weekend
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:10 AM): Was it any good?
Talraen (Tue 9:10 AM): Hey I don't have rage
Talraen (Tue 9:11 AM): I liked it, but all the fan service took me out of the movie a bit
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:12 AM): I did hear there was a lot of fan service
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:12 AM): Was it to the franchise as a whole, or just to the original star trek show/movies?
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:13 AM): Because I don't know if I'd get a lot of the original star trek fan service stuff
Talraen (Tue 9:17 AM): Well most of it was to Wrath of Khan
Talraen (Tue 9:17 AM): And there were a few references to the original Khan episode, although I wouldn't call that stuff fan service
Talraen (Tue 9:18 AM): FWIW, Matt loved the movie, and I apparently hate everything, so you should probably see it Smile
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:18 AM): Yeah, I was under the impression this movie was basically going to be a remake/reimmagining of Wrath Of Khan
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:19 AM): Don't feel bad for hating everything Dowd. Your hate is very reliable.
Balerion (Tue 9:23 AM): I wouldn't say it's a remake of Wrath of Khan
Balerion (Tue 9:24 AM): just uses Khan as the villain
Balerion (Tue 9:24 AM): or one of the villains
Talraen (Tue 9:24 AM): A fact which they went to pretty extreme lengths to hide, despite it leaking like a year ago
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:25 AM): Yeah, I heard it leaked a while ago, but was surprised they weren't pimping it hardcore on the trailers
Talraen (Tue 9:25 AM): Chuck Klostermann talked about it on a podcast yesterday (forget the other guy's name), and had a great niggling question...
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:25 AM): I told my friend and he didn't believe me
Talraen (Tue 9:26 AM): "What situation after this led to Khan obtaining Ricardo Montabon's accent?"
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:26 AM): That's racist Dowd.
Balerion (Tue 9:27 AM): Easy - Brain damage from McCoy putting him in an improper cryogenic freeze
Talraen (Tue 9:27 AM): lol
Talraen (Tue 9:29 AM): btw so far the iO9 article is fantastic
Talraen (Tue 9:30 AM): Oh I do have one very specific complaint about Star Trek - what the hell is the point of removing Kirk's command and then immediately giving it back?
Talraen (Tue 9:30 AM): Totally extraneous plotlines appear to have become a deep pet peeve of mine
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:31 AM): It wouldn't be star trek without a B story line
Balerion (Tue 9:32 AM): I actually didn't have a problem with that
Balerion (Tue 9:32 AM): my reasoning is: There actually were some pretty severe consequences for his action, but the exigences of the moment trumped them
Balerion (Tue 9:32 AM): also: he was given back his command so he could be the fall guy for Admiral Marcus' scheme
Talraen (Tue 9:33 AM): Yeah, but wouldn't the movie have been tighter and, frankly, better if none of that ever happened?
Balerion (Tue 9:33 AM): As I mentioned on the phone the other day, my major complaint is cosmetic in scope
Talraen (Tue 9:33 AM): I'm not saying it didn't make sense in-world (I'm certainly not saying it did, but one debate at a time Smile), I'm saying it didn't make sense as part of the script
Balerion (Tue 9:33 AM): No, because it wouldn't have established Kirk as having a low point to grow from.
Talraen (Tue 9:34 AM): lol @ "I don’t know. I think it’s nice that in this day and age, a white male can still be cast as an Indian played by a Mexican. White men really have come a long way!"
Talraen (Tue 9:34 AM): I feel like the first movie covered that
Talraen (Tue 9:35 AM): btw speaking of stupid plot points, Khan and Kirk fight in the original episode, and Kirk wins clean
Balerion (Tue 9:35 AM): <shrug> even if it did, the movie is kind of pointless if the main character doesn't have any room to grow
Talraen (Tue 9:36 AM): I mean yeah, he uses a weapon at the end, but it's not like he was using some dirty unknown trick
Balerion (Tue 9:36 AM): And i09 brings up that point too - that Kirk had that arc in the first film
Balerion (Tue 9:36 AM): and I'm not really sure that he did
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:36 AM): Speaking of cosmetic complaints: how were the lens flairs in this movie?
Balerion (Tue 9:37 AM): Massive
Balerion (Tue 9:37 AM): His arc from the first movie went from him being a loner reject to someone integrated into Starfleet but as a rebel
Balerion (Tue 9:38 AM): This one took him from being a rebel to someone who actually empathized for his crew and took responsibility seriously
Talraen (Tue 9:39 AM): I don't disagree that Kirk needed a low point, I just think it was dumb and inconsequential
Balerion (Tue 9:40 AM): Though, that being said, Tor.com made a good point the other day - the "Kirk as rule-breaker" persona is strictly a construct of these new films
Balerion (Tue 9:40 AM): In the TV show Kirk is straight as an arrow - obeys every order he's given
Balerion (Tue 9:40 AM): The only time he really breaks ranks is in Search for Spock, and he does that to save the life of his best friend
Talraen (Tue 9:44 AM): Yeah I guess that's the whole effect of not having his dad
Talraen (Tue 9:44 AM): The thing is, the entire premise of this reboot makes no sense - if Kirk's life was changed that much, there's no way he ends up at the same rank on the same ship with the same crew
Talraen (Tue 9:45 AM): I'm willing to suspend disbelief, but only so far
Talraen (Tue 9:45 AM): On the other hand, not making any attempt to make sense might be better than the usual Star Trek MO, which is to try to sound like it's making sense but not have any consistency or scientific basis
Talraen (Tue 9:47 AM): That Fight Club phone thing is pretty awesome
Cuzzdog (Tue 9:53 AM): I love those kinds of slipped in minor details in movies
Talraen (Tue 10:01 AM): The new Xbox is going to be revealed today. And thank god, I'm sick of hearing about the announcement COMING SOON
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:03 AM): I'm kind of a one giant ball of "MEH" on all these new consoles
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:04 AM): I have no idea what the next gen of consoles can provide for me that my current one can't
Talraen (Tue 10:04 AM): Me either
Talraen (Tue 10:04 AM): Technologically, I'm perfectly happy with last gen
Talraen (Tue 10:05 AM): Really all they can add is across-the-board 1080p support and 3D - the former is barely noticeable, and the latter is something I actively don't want
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:05 AM): Agreed. Typically a next gen ushers in better graphics, but you can't even realistically get that anymore either
Talraen (Tue 10:05 AM): So.... yeah I'm with you there
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:06 AM): Was there any big selling point for the PS4?
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:07 AM): I guess it's a bad sign that I can't recall anything about it Smile
Talraen (Tue 10:07 AM): Same here, I have no idea
Talraen (Tue 10:07 AM): I will buy these consoles if and when they release a game I must have (i.e., a Final Fantasy game Wink)
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:14 AM): Just re-read the PS4 announcement. It boils down to having a PS4 kinect (which might not even be included in the base hardware) and the ability to make a RAM image dump so you can power down and pick up instantly where you left off
Talraen (Tue 10:15 AM): Oh well now I'm sold
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:15 AM): This chat functionality does not have a font big enough to convey the yawn I'm feeling over that right now
Talraen (Tue 10:15 AM): Didn't they kill some or all of the backwards compatibility, too?
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:15 AM): Yeah, all backwards comparability is gone
Talraen (Tue 10:16 AM): Yeah from a practical standpoint, that makes it a non-starter for me: I still play tons of old games, and I don't have any more HDMI ports
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:16 AM): And the games looks identical to the PS3 on their hyped up intro, no gameplay at all trailers
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:19 AM): My big guess for the "wow" factor on the new xbox? Built in kinect, blu-ray player.
Talraen (Tue 10:19 AM): Don't forget the inevitable promised "you can watch TV through your console!" thing that a.) never happens and b.) would be pointless anyway
Cuzzdog (Tue 10:20 AM): And c) effectively already happens with hulu and netflix anyway?
Balerion (Tue 10:55 AM): I'm kind of waiting for the new XBox to announce that it won't support any physical formats at all, and will just be a black cube with a green X in it
Balerion (Tue 10:55 AM): And is actually secretly part of the Riddler's plot to take over Gotham City
Balerion (Tue 10:57 AM): The other fun possibility is that every new system has enough power to render everything in just enough detail for every NPC represented to fall solidly within the uncanny valley
Cuzzdog (Tue 11:07 AM): That actually sounds exactly like the new android based gaming console
Cuzzdog (Tue 11:08 AM): Oh, sorry, it's a white cube, not black.
Talraen (Tue 12:05 PM): Are you talking about the Ouya? I thought that was black
Talraen (Tue 12:05 PM): Is it weird that I want to talk about an MMO, but I don
Talraen (Tue 12:05 PM): 't want anyone else to play it?
Cuzzdog (Tue 12:17 PM): Weird in general, or weird for you specifically? Smile
Talraen (Tue 12:20 PM): lol touche
Talraen (Tue 12:42 PM): Really? "New York City FC"? Way to put effort into naming your new MLS team, guys (FC stands for "Football Club" btw)
Balerion (Tue 12:43 PM): yeah, that's a little lame
Talraen (Tue 12:46 PM): And they don't start for two years? See this is why MLS is lame. That and because the current NY team is called the Red Bulls
Talraen (Tue 12:46 PM): I could see rooting for NYCFC, unimaginative as it is. I refuse to root for energy drinks. Even if they have Thierry Henry
Talraen (Tue 1:24 PM): Wait, the "Xbox One"? Are you serious?
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:26 PM): Makes sense. The only thing better than a bigger number is being number one
Talraen (Tue 1:27 PM): And yes it does have Blu-ray, and set-top box capabilities
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:27 PM): Whoo! All of our crazy predictions came tru
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:28 PM): Now I can die easy, knowing I don't give a shit Smile
Talraen (Tue 1:28 PM): lol yep
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:45 PM): It has a retro kind of look to it
Talraen (Tue 1:46 PM): In that it's a featureless rectangular box?
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:47 PM): Pretty much
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:47 PM): even that two tone black matte finish vs the air vents all over the place make me think of wood paneling trim
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:55 PM): From reading this wired article it sounds like they almost spent more time improving the kinect than the actual xbox
Talraen (Tue 1:56 PM): Honestly, that's probably a good idea, from a "hey what the hell can we improve on this thing?" standpoint
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:57 PM): It sounds like they made improvements to the point where you can play in any condition. They have a 6'4" guy standing 3 foot away with his hands stretched out and he's being fully recognized
Talraen (Tue 1:58 PM): Oh hey an actual cross-shaped D-pad. That's the second most interesting thing I've seen
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:58 PM): They also mention that it works in the dark now too
Talraen (Tue 1:58 PM): (the first is a live action Halo TV show... not because I care, but because at least it's new)
Cuzzdog (Tue 1:58 PM): Yeah, it looks like they just tightened up the controller in general too, without actually making it any different
Talraen (Tue 1:59 PM): Making it different would have been stupid, so I'm all for that
Cuzzdog (Tue 2:02 PM): I have to say, reading towards the end with the more centrally designed all-in-one media solution does sounds pretty good
Cuzzdog (Tue 2:03 PM): No word on backwards compatibility though Frown
Talraen (Tue 2:06 PM): Oh I'm sure it's out
Cuzzdog (Tue 2:06 PM): Huh. They're making all games be mandatory to install from a disk before you can play
Talraen (Tue 2:07 PM): I mean, it barely worked last time, and the Xbox has never made a business of selling old games
Talraen (Tue 2:07 PM): A lot of PS3 and original Xbox games work like that. It's called "having a required hard drive"
Cuzzdog (Tue 2:08 PM): Second article with some analysis
Cuzzdog (Tue 2:10 PM): Oh yeah, there's backwards compatibility confirmed as not happeneing
Cuzzdog (Tue 2:11 PM): And a lot of shiny pictures
Balerion (Tue 2:41 PM): The most relevant piece to me is that the new kinect sensor can be used as close as 3' away, making it legit for apartment dwellers
Balerion (Tue 2:46 PM): On the horsepower front
Balerion (Tue 2:46 PM): while I agree that I don't really need graphics to get any better, It hink there's still value in upping the overall capabilities
Balerion (Tue 2:47 PM): Ideally you should be able to start rendering things in the level of graphics we had now that you couldn't before (for example, Dwarf Fortress)
Balerion (Tue 2:48 PM): Honestly, the wired article makes a strong pitch for the XBox as your living room hub
Balerion (Tue 2:49 PM): In many ways it feels like the XBox is being positioned as a communal space, voice activated computer
Balerion (Tue 2:51 PM): The use of Azure for computing is also interesting - I feel like it's following an increasing trend for that kind of thing
Balerion (Tue 2:51 PM): I know Steve says he uses a lot of cloud computing services at work, and was reading an article the other day that says Netflix probably makes more efficient use of Amazon's hardware than Amazon does
Balerion (Tue 2:53 PM): Also fascinating - the start and select buttons on the controller have been replaced with icons that are familiar to everyone with a smartphone
Cuzzdog (Tue 3:02 PM): Yeah, I wasn't too excited about the new xbox, but reading about the possibilities of it's centralized media hub stuff is pretty intreging
Balerion (Tue 3:06 PM): once I worked out the kinks I was kind of shocked at how convenient it was to use the kinect to communicate, and kind of like the idea of it having a bigger role
Balerion (Tue 3:06 PM): Tesla pitching to VCs
Balerion (Tue 3:11 PM): uh oh, Mike, dealbreaker: Xbox One will not play 360 discs, XBLA games and gamerscores do not transer
Balerion (Tue 3:12 PM): oh, sorry, misread - Gamerscore does transfer
Talraen (Tue 3:24 PM): Dodged a bullet there!
Balerion (Tue 3:31 PM): seriously Smile
Cuzzdog (Tue 3:39 PM): Damn straight gamerscores transfer!
Cuzzdog (Tue 3:40 PM): I knew nothing plays on discs, and that no games were going to be backwards compatible
Balerion (8:44 AM): So, I'm not so bothered about the way Microsoft is messing with the used games market
Balerion (8:44 AM): but it really seems to kill off the idea of loaning a game to your friend too, and that does piss me off a bit
Cuzzdog (9:09 AM): That does seem to be exactly what it's doing
Cuzzdog (9:10 AM): But I'm sure the PS4 is going to do the same thing too
Cuzzdog (9:10 AM): Apparently it's not a dead idea entirely. A secondary system can install the games as well, but most likely for an import fee
Cuzzdog (9:11 AM): Which would presumably be cheaper than buying the game new
Balerion (9:22 AM): Yeah, the "presumably" bit is the question, I'll be curious to see what they announce
Talraen (4:14 PM): Oh shit, double EXP weekend in FFXI right after a double EXP ring... wait I need to find a gray lining for this silver cloud. Um... my skills won't keep up?
Cuzzdog (4:45 PM): That they're making EXP so abundant is a sure sign the game is about to die and this is a last ditch effort to retain a consumer base?
Talraen (6:31 PM): Actually making EXP so abundant is what killed the base for the game in the first place. This is actually intended to get people to do anything EXCEPT the system that did that (it doesn't apply there)
Active Users: Cuzzdog
1 user viewing | Refresh | Expand